Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), with an 81 score against 75.8. Galaxy XCover Pro is a a lot newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), but it is somewhat heavier and notably thicker. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a little bit bigger display, a little greater screen pixels density and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy XCover Pro takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory. Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 13% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.