Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than Galaxy A7 (2017), with an 88.5 score against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip design is much newer, a little thinner and a bit lighter than the Galaxy A7 (2017). The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a larger display.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a camera in the back with way less megapixels, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos. The Galaxy A7 (2017) has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 9% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.