Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), with a overall score of 92.3 against 75.8. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is notably newer, just a bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017). Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bigger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little better screen density. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.