Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-01-13 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy A7 (2017)'s global score of 75.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's body is way newer than Galaxy A7 (2017)'s, although it is thicker and somewhat heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a slightly better display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bigger display and a little more pixels per inch in the display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 39 percent bigger battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.