Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 is a bit better than Galaxy A70, having a global score of 83.3 against 76.9. The iPhone 11 body is just a bit heavier and a little bit thicker than Galaxy A70. The iPhone 11 counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy A70 comes with Android 10 operating system. The iPhone 11 features a superior processor than Galaxy A70, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone 11 features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a bit lower pixels density, a lot worse 828 x 1792 resolution and a quite smaller screen. IPhone 11 captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the iPhone 11 also counts with a bigger sensor and better video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much better storage to store more games and applications than iPhone 11, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a very superior battery life than iPhone 11, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3110mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 11 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 11, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A70, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.