Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a lot better than the Galaxy A70, with a 93.3 score against 76.9. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy A70 comes with Android 10 OS. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's construction is extremely newer and a little thinner, but also heavier than Galaxy A70. IPhone 13 Pro features a more vivid display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1170 x 2532 resolution and a just a bit higher screen pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The iPhone 13 Pro features a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , and they both have 6 GB of RAM, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also has a bigger aperture for better images and video in low light environments and better video frame rates. The Galaxy A70 counts with a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3095mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A70. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A70, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.