Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 general score. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A70 comes with Android 10 operating system. Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is notably heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A70, it's a little thinner and newer.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size screen, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a quite better 1284 x 2778 resolution and a just a little higher pixel count per inch of screen. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores (although faster), and they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone 13 Pro Max features a way better camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a larger aperture for better photography in low-light situations and faster 60 fps video frame rates. The Galaxy A70 has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A70 has a bit better battery performance than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A70. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A70, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.