Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 16.x |
| 2019-04-26 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has a global score of 94.9, which is way better than Galaxy A70's 76.9 overall score. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max's design has the same thickness than the Galaxy A70, but it is extremely heavier. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max comes with iOS 16.x OS, and Galaxy A70 comes with Android 10 OS.
IPhone 14 Pro Max features a superior hardware performance than Galaxy A70, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. IPhone 14 Pro Max features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size display, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also has a little bit greater pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1290 x 2796 pixels.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a much better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with higher video frame rates. The Galaxy A70 has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A70 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A70 counts with just a bit better battery performance than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4323mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A70. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A70, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.