Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 9.x |
| 2019-04-26 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 6s is a little bit better than the Galaxy A70, having an 83 score against 76.9. The iPhone 6s counts with iOS 9.x OS, and Galaxy A70 counts with Android 10 OS. Despite of the fact that the iPhone 6s is much older than Galaxy A70, it's construction is incredibly lighter and just a bit thinner.
Apple iPhone 6s features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A70, because although it has a lower number of cores and they are also slower and 4 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone 6s has a better looking screen than Galaxy A70, although it has a way smaller screen, a just a bit worse screen density and a way lower 1334 x 750 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A70 has a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
IPhone 6s shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a way tinier aperture and a tinier sensor capturing worse quality photos, they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
Although Apple iPhone 6s is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 6s, else you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A70, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.