Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 Plus is better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, having a overall score of 87.1 against 76.9. The iPhone 8 Plus construction is a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A70, but it is a little bit heavier and was released only 19 months before. IPhone 8 Plus counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little better display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a bit more storage to install applications and games than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The iPhone 8 Plus shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture and a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the iPhone 8 Plus also counts with higher video frame rates.
Although iPhone 8 Plus is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A70. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy iPhone 8 Plus, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A70, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.