Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 overall score. Despite of the fact that Apple iPhone X is older than the Samsung Galaxy A70, it's body is just a little thinner and just a little lighter. The Apple iPhone X counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The iPhone X counts with a superior processing power than Galaxy A70, because although it has less cores (but faster) and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A70 features a much longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 66% more battery capacity. The Apple iPhone X takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Apple iPhone X also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A70. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A70, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.