Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is a bit better than Galaxy A70, getting a score of 84.2 against 76.9. Apple iPhone XS's body is a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A70, even though both were released with only a few months difference. The iPhone XS features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1125 x 2436px resolution and a little bit higher screen pixels density.
Apple iPhone XS has a greater hardware performance than Galaxy A70, because although it has less CPU cores (although faster) and 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Galaxy A70 has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A70 counts with a very superior battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has a 69% larger battery size. IPhone XS features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the iPhone XS also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality photos and higher video frame rates.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A70. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone XS, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A70, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.