Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Blue and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 has a global score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A70's score of 76.9. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Google Nexus 6 is a incredibly older, much thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone than Galaxy A70. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Google Nexus 6 has an older 5.1 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version.
The Google Nexus 6 features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Google Nexus 6 features a sharper screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a quite better display density.
The Google Nexus 6 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a very superior battery performance than Google Nexus 6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A70. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A70, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.