Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is slightly better than the Galaxy A70, having an 80.2 score against 76.9. The Google Pixel is a notably older and just a bit thicker cellphone than the Galaxy A70, but Google was able to make it incredibly lighter anyway. The Google Pixel has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A70 has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Google Pixel features a way better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Google Pixel also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a superior battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2770mAh.
The Google Pixel costs exactly the same than Galaxy A70, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.