Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has an overall score of 82.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy A70's 76.9 overall score. Google Pixel 2 XL is a just a little bit lighter phone than the Galaxy A70, but both are equally thin. Google Pixel 2 XL has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A70, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A70 counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has greater battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3520mAh. Google Pixel 2 XL has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Google Pixel 2 XL also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 2 XL is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.