Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 global score. Google Pixel 3 is a lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy A70, but they have the same thickness. Google Pixel 3 features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A70, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 3 has a very superior camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality photographs.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.