Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is slightly better than Galaxy A70, with an 80.7 score against 76.9. Google Pixel 3 XL's design has the same thickness than Galaxy A70, but it's just a bit heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A70, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a better pixel number in each inch of display. Google Pixel 3 XL shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 3 XL also counts with a bigger camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A70 counts with better battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.