Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 general score. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it gives some extra features and enhanced performance. Even though Google Pixel 3a and Samsung Galaxy A70 were released with only 0 months difference, the Google Pixel 3a body is somewhat lighter but also a bit thicker.
The Galaxy A70 has a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2220px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel count in each inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 3a captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photos or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 3a also counts with a larger back camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 50% larger battery size.
The Google Pixel 3a is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.