Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a general score of 78.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A70's 76.9 score. The Google Pixel 3a XL construction is just a little thicker but a little lighter than the Galaxy A70, and both of them were released only 0 months apart. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has a newer 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10, so it gives you some additional features and enhanced performance.
Galaxy A70 has a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A70 also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A70 and the Google Pixel 3a XL count with similar screens, because although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a little lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Pixel 3a XL also counts with a larger sensor capturing better quality pictures. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 22% larger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a XL is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.