Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A70's global score of 76.9. The Google Pixel 4 design is just a little bit thicker but lighter than Galaxy A70, and both were released only a couple of months apart. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A70. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores.
Google Pixel 4 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. Google Pixel 4 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also has a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
Google Pixel 4 costs a little more money than Samsung Galaxy A70, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.