Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A70's 76.9 overall score. Google Pixel 4 XL's design is just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy A70. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A70. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px. Google Pixel 4 XL shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy A70 features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A70. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, else you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A70, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.