Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A70's score of 76.9. Even though Google Pixel 4a is just a bit thicker than Galaxy A70, it's way lighter and also newer. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a has the newer 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10.
The Google Pixel 4a has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A70. They have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite higher pixel quantity in each display inch.
The Google Pixel 4a takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 4a also has a bigger sensor. Galaxy A70 has a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A70 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a is more expensive than Galaxy A70, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.