Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the Galaxy A70, having a global score of 87.5 against 76.9. Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little thicker than Galaxy A70, it's just a bit lighter and newer. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A70. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel quantity in each display inch.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A70 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3885mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.