Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Honor 50 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy A70, having a score of 77 against 76.9. These devices have Android OS, but Honor 50 Pro has newer 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version. Honor 50 Pro's construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy A70, but it's just a little heavier.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Honor 50 Pro features a bit better display than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size screen, the Honor 50 Pro also has a little higher resolution of 1236 x 2676 pixels and a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A70 features a bit more memory for apps and games than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Honor 50 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and videos in poorly lited environments, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Honor 50 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.