Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a global score of 77.7, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A70's general score of 76.9. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but HTC One M9 has 5.0 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version. The HTC One M9 construction is somewhat lighter than the Galaxy A70, although it is thicker and was released many years before.
The HTC One M9 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A70, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processor. HTC One M9 features a brighter screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better display pixel density.
Galaxy A70 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A70 features a much better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
The HTC One M9 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photos and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the HTC One M9 also counts with a larger sensor shooting better quality photos and videos.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the HTC One M9 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.