Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 has a score of 77.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A70's overall score of 76.9. The HTC U11 design has the same thickness than the Galaxy A70, but it is a little lighter. The HTC U11 features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC U11, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The HTC U11 features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A70, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity. HTC U11 has a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the HTC U11 also has a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the HTC U11 is also cheap compared to the Samsung Galaxy A70.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.