Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70, with a general score of 77 against 76.9. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G7 Fit has a newer 8.1 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it provides some additional features and better performance. The LG G7 Fit body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A70, but it is lighter.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy A70 counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4 more cpu cores (but slower) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features more storage for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG G7 Fit counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a way smaller diafragm aperture and a tinier sensor taking lower quality videos and images, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a really longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.