Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, having a general score of 81 against 76.9. LG G7 ThinQ's body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A70, but it is somewhat lighter. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but LG G7 ThinQ has newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
The LG G7 ThinQ has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. LG G7 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
LG G7 ThinQ features slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A70 features a much better battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 50% more battery size.
The LG G7 ThinQ shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture and higher video frame rates.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, LG G7 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.