Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8S ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy A70, with a score of 82.5 against 76.9. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but the LG G8S ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version. The LG G8S ThinQ design has the same thickness than Galaxy A70, but it is just a bit lighter.
The LG G8S ThinQ counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2248 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. LG G8S ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG G8S ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G8S ThinQ has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A70. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount. LG G8S ThinQ takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG G8S ThinQ also counts with faster video frame rates.
Galaxy A70 has greater battery performance than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.