Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a overall score of 85.4 against 76.9. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide you all the same OS features. The LG K92 is a newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A70, but it's just a little thicker and a little bit heavier.
The LG K92 and Galaxy A70 both have incredibly similar displays, they have a display with the same size, the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and the same pixel density. The Galaxy A70 and the LG K92 count with similar processing units, both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The LG K92 counts with a superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG K92 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG K92 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy A70 features a bit better battery performance than LG K92, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
LG K92 is more expensive than Galaxy A70, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.