Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's global score of 76.9. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10. The LG V30S ThinQ construction is lighter and a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A70, even though it was released about a year before.
LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a greater pixels density.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A70 has greater battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A70. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A70, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.