Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Galaxy A70, with an 81.3 score against 76.9. LG V35 ThinQ's body is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy A70, although it was released about 11 months before. LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. LG V35 ThinQ shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments.
LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A70 has improved battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG V35 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.