Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a general score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Galaxy A70's global score of 76.9. LG V40 ThinQ is a a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner cellphone than Galaxy A70, although both were released with only a few months difference. These devices come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
LG V40 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a greater display pixels density. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A70. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 6 GB of RAM.
LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A70, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG V40 ThinQ also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a bigger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the LG V40 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.