Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is much better than Galaxy A70, with a score of 87.6 against 76.9. LG V60 ThinQ is a newer phone than Galaxy A70, but it is thicker and heavier. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10. LG V60 ThinQ has a little bit better display than Galaxy A70, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a little better display density and a little larger display.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG V60 ThinQ has much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A70, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The LG V60 ThinQ costs a bit more than Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.