Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 overall score. LG Velvet is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A70, but both of them have the same thickness. LG Velvet has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A70, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a little larger display.
The LG Velvet counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A70. They have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A70 features a bit better battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. LG Velvet takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG Velvet is also cheap compared to the Galaxy A70, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.