Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a general score of 78.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy A70's 76.9 score. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has the newer 12 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing you a lot of extra features and performance tweaks. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's body is notably newer, just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A70.
The Galaxy A70 has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a brighter screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a just a bit higher screen density.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.