Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an overall score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's score of 76.9. Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a much newer and just a little bit lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy A70, although it is a little bit thicker. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing some additional features and a performance increase.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a way better display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater screen density and a quite better 1256 x 2760 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a slightly bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much bigger sensor.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.