Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A70's general score of 76.9. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it is a bit heavier and a little thicker. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much sharper display than Galaxy A70. Both have the same pixel density, the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a same size display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A70, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's battery performance is very similar to Galaxy A70's battery duration. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.