Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 is slightly better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), getting a score of 76.9 against 76. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version and Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version. Galaxy A70 is an extremely older phone than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but it's just a little lighter and thinner anyway.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a slightly better screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a just a little lower screen density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A70 also counts with a bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much better processing power than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy A70 counts with a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a way smaller sensor and a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photos in low-light situations, they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.