Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is better than Galaxy A70, with a score of 86.2 against 76.9. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto G200 5G has the newer 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10, giving some additional features. Motorola Moto G200 5G's design is extremely newer than Galaxy A70's, although it is a bit heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory. Moto G200 5G features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a bit bigger screen.
The Moto G200 5G captures greater videos and photos than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates. The Galaxy A70 counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A70, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.