Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 is just a bit better than the Moto G7 Plus, with a 76.9 score against 76.1. Galaxy A70's construction is just a little heavier but just a bit thinner than Moto G7 Plus, and both of them were released only a couple months apart. These phones include the same Android 10 operating system, so both should count with very similar OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has more RAM memory. Moto G7 Plus has a screen that is just as good as the screen in Galaxy A70, because although the Moto G7 Plus has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2270px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density.
Motorola Moto G7 Plus takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A70 features a much better battery performance than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.