Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, having a 76.9 score against 76. Samsung Galaxy A70's construction is somewhat thinner and a little lighter than Motorola Moto G8 Power, although it was released around 12 months before. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 and the Moto G8 Power both count with extremely similar displays, because although the Moto G8 Power has a bit worse 1080 x 2300 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher display pixel density. Galaxy A70 features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A70 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Moto G8 Power has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A70, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G8 Power captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both have a same size sensor, a same size aperture, the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it is more expensive than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G8 Power. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A70, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G8 Power, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.