Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-04-26 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A70 has an older 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. The Samsung Galaxy A70 is a way newer device than Moto Z Force, although it's heavier and a little thicker.
Moto Z Force has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better screen density. The Moto Z Force features just a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A70, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has just a little better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Moto Z Force features a greater camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier camera aperture, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A70 has superior battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 29 percent greater battery size.
Although Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs more money than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z Force. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.