Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a score of 76.9 against 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy A70 design is way newer than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's, but it is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy A70 has just a bit better performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has more cpu cores and 2 GB more RAM.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better display density. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with just a bit more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A70, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A70 features longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.