Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Force Edition is a bit better than the Galaxy A70, getting a global score of 77.4 against 76.9. The Moto Z2 Force Edition is an older device than Galaxy A70, but it's noticeably lighter and notably thinner anyway. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos and a smaller back-facing camera sensor, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A70, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A70 has a very superior battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A70. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, otherwise you can save some money and get the Galaxy A70, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.