Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a general score of 77.4, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A70's 76.9 score. Even though Motorola Moto Z2 Play is older than the Galaxy A70, it's construction is way lighter and a lot thinner. Moto Z2 Play has a processor that's just as good as the CPU in Galaxy A70, and although the Moto Z2 Play has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Moto Z2 Play counts with a screen that's very similar to the Galaxy A70 one, because although the Moto Z2 Play has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better display pixel density. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A70, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features a superior battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Moto Z2 Play takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A70. Both have the same video quality, the same video frame rates and a same size camera aperture.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Motorola Moto Z2 Play is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.