Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 is a bit better than the Galaxy A70, with a 77.6 score against 76.9. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Moto Z3 has newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10, so it gives a couple additional features. Even though the Motorola Moto Z3 and Galaxy A70 were only released 8 months apart, the Motorola Moto Z3 is somewhat lighter and thinner.
Moto Z3 has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch. The Moto Z3 features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A70, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Moto Z3 captures way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a tinier sensor providing a lower image quality, they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
The Motorola Moto Z3 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the Samsung Galaxy A70.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.