Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is a little bit better than Moto Z3 Play, having a 76.9 score against 76.3. Although the Galaxy A70 is newer than the Moto Z3 Play, it is somewhat heavier and thicker. The Galaxy A70 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A70 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A70 and Motorola Moto Z3 Play feature really similar displays, because although the Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixel count per inch of screen. The Moto Z3 Play takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto Z3 Play also has a larger sensor.
The Moto Z3 Play has a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy A70 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.