Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a score of 79.8 against 76.9. Both devices in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Motorola One Hyper has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10, giving you some nice extra features. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, Motorola One Hyper is an a bit heavier and thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A70.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola One Hyper and Galaxy A70 have extremely similar screens, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola One Hyper counts with just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate.
Galaxy A70 counts with just a bit better battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Motorola One Hyper is more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.