Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is better than Galaxy A70's 76.9 overall score. The Motorola razr (2020) design has the same thickness than Galaxy A70, but it is a bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS, but Motorola razr (2020) has the newer 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version.
Motorola razr (2020) has a little faster processor than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bigger display and a bit greater display density.
Galaxy A70 has slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A70, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.